Last edited by Duran
Monday, August 3, 2020 | History

3 edition of Case Concerning Oil Platforms Islamic Republic Of Iran V. Usa Judgment Of 6 November 2003 found in the catalog.

Case Concerning Oil Platforms Islamic Republic Of Iran V. Usa Judgment Of 6 November 2003

Case Concerning Oil Platforms Islamic Republic Of Iran V. United ... Of America Judgment Of 6 November 2003

  • 175 Want to read
  • 10 Currently reading

Published by United Nations Pubns .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • International,
  • Natural Resources,
  • Nature,
  • Nature/Ecology

  • The Physical Object
    FormatPaperback
    Number of Pages464
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL12893101M
    ISBN 109210709845
    ISBN 109789210709842
    OCLC/WorldCa210160758

    Case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Counter-claims, Judgment of 6 November , [] ICJ Rep. , at para. 49 (Separate Opinion, Judge Higgins). See also generally Gourgourinis, A.   The Court recalls that in its Judgment on the preliminary objection in the case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Preliminary Objection, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports (II), p. ), it had to rule on the scope of the concept of "freedom of commerce" within the meaning of Article X, paragraph 1, of.

    since is the Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America)3 decision of November Thus the case is of obvious import ance in relation to the development of the substantive law on the use of force, and particularly that of self-defence. However, the case is also significant in that it raises. Operation Praying Mantis was an attack on 18 April , by U.S. forces within Iranian territorial waters in retaliation for the Iranian mining of the Persian Gulf during the Iran–Iraq War and the subsequent damage to an American warship.. On 14 April, the guided missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts struck a mine while deployed in the Persian Gulf as part of Operation Earnest Will, the

    International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment of 6 November , I.C.J. Reports , p. International Court of Justice, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion of 9 July , I.C.J. Reports. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Preliminary Objections. Judgment of 12 December On 2 November the Islamic Republic of Iran instituted proceedings against the United States of America with respect to the destruction of Iranian oil platforms.


Share this book
You might also like
reconsideration of the unfinished Sly framework in The taming of the shrew.

reconsideration of the unfinished Sly framework in The taming of the shrew.

Ē Koilada me ta ampelia

Ē Koilada me ta ampelia

Essentials of Audiology

Essentials of Audiology

The roots of American civilization

The roots of American civilization

A letter to John Wilkes, Esq; Sheriff of London and Middlesex; in which the extortion and oppression of sheriffs officers, with many other alarming abuses, are exemplified and detected; and a remedy proposed: ... By Robert Holloway, ...

A letter to John Wilkes, Esq; Sheriff of London and Middlesex; in which the extortion and oppression of sheriffs officers, with many other alarming abuses, are exemplified and detected; and a remedy proposed: ... By Robert Holloway, ...

The Mammoth book of contemporary SF masters

The Mammoth book of contemporary SF masters

Distance in graphs

Distance in graphs

Jewish people and Jesus Christ after Auschwitz

Jewish people and Jesus Christ after Auschwitz

Treasure crew

Treasure crew

Simulation of flow and transport in the lower Mississippi River, Louisiana

Simulation of flow and transport in the lower Mississippi River, Louisiana

Sound-bite saboteurs

Sound-bite saboteurs

Case Concerning Oil Platforms Islamic Republic Of Iran V. Usa Judgment Of 6 November 2003 Download PDF EPUB FB2

Overview of the case On 2 Novemberthe Islamic Republic of Iran filed in the Registry of the Court an Application instituting proceedings against the United States of America with respect to the destruction of Iranian oil platforms. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v.

United States of America) Cases Previous Next Overview of the case Institution of proceedings. Iran–Iraq War#U.S. military actions toward Iran References [ edit ] ^ "Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America - Oil Platforms - Judgment of 6 November - Judgments [] ICJ 4; ICJ Reportsp ; [] ICJ Rep (6 November )".

On November 6,the International Court of Justice issued its decision in Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America).' In this case, Iran claimed that the United States had breached the "freedom of commerce" provision in the Treaty of.

"The United States of America requests that the Court uphold the objection of the United States to the jurisdiction of the Court in the case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v.

United States of America)." On behalf of the Government of Iran, at the hearing of 24 September at the hearing of 7 Marchon the counter-claim of the United States: "The Islamic Republic of Iran respectfully requests the Court, rejecting all contrary claims and submissions, to adjudge and declare: That the United States counter-claim be dismissed." On behalf of the Government of the United States.

on the merits in the Case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America). 1 The decision, handed down more than 10 years after Iran initiated proceedings, brought to a close a series of disputes between Iran. Oil Platforms (Iran v. U.S.), I.C.J.

(Nov. 6) Represented By: Iran: Mr. Zahedin-Labbaf, Agent of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Deputy Director for Legal Affairs, Bureau of International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran, The Hague, as Agent.

Order of 28 August Authorizing submission of pleading relating to Counter-Claim and fixing of time-limit therefor. Press release /51 26 November Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) - The Court authorizes the submission of a Reply by the Islamic Republic of Iran and a Rejoinder by the United States of America and fixes the time-limits for the filing of.

1 Iran brought an action against the United States of America concerning two attacks by US armed forces destroying a number of Iranian oil production installations in the Persian Gulf which occurred during the armed conflict between Iraq and Iran (–88).

Summary. Case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Summary of the Judgment of 6 November "Oil Platforms, Iran v United States, Judgment, merits, ICJ GL No 90, [] ICJ RepICGJ 74 (ICJ ), 6th NovemberInternational Court of.

Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Discover the CiteMap in 3 minutes Type of case: Inter-State. Date of introduction: Unknown. Status of the case: Concluded (non-ISDS case) States Parties: United States. 1 APPLICAtIon FoR ReVIsIon oF tHe JUDGMent oF 11 JULY In tHe CAse ConCeRnInG APPLICAtIon oF tHe ConVentIon on tHe PReVentIon AnD PUnIsHMent oF tHe CRIMe oF GenoCIDe (BosnIA AnD HeRZeGoVInA.

Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) II. [6 November ] ICJ 90 III. Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Reportsp. Facts a. Islamic Republic of Iran invoking the International Court of Justice’s jurisdiction on the basis of Article XXI (2) of the Treaty of.

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew () Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America): Did the ICJ Miss the Boat on the Law on the Use of Force. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 5(1), pp. Cited by: 4. "The United States of America requests that the Court uphold the objection of the United States to the jurisdiction of the Court in the case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v.

United States of America)." On behalf of the Government of Iran, at the hearing of 24 September 1. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran States of America) Preliminary Objection, Judgment of 12 Dec. The judgment was adopted by 14 votes to 2.

Dissenting opinions were given by Judges Schwebel and Oda and separate opinions by Judges Shahabuddeen, Ranjeva, Higgins, Parra- Aranguren and Judge ad hoc Rigaux (appointed by Iran).

At the time of writing the judgment had not. In an Order issued in the case concerning oil platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), the Court delivered a Judgment by which it rejected the preliminary objection to its. The International Court of Justice rendered its judgement on the merits in the case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v.

United States of America) on 6 November This article reviews the judgement, focusing on the Court's substantive legal determinations on the scope of ‘armed attack’ under the right of self-defence.6 November Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v.

United States of America) Decision of the Court. THE HAGUE, 6 November Today the International Court of Justice (ICJ), principal judicial organ of the United Nations, delivered its Judgment in the case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran States of America).In particular, Iran points to the actions of the U.S.

judiciary, the Executive Branch, and Congress in connection with the enforcement proceeding in Peterson et al. v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al., case no. CV (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) – which resulted in the turnover to plaintiffs holding.